One of the books that became a major influence on how I
approach the Bible is The
Art of Biblical Narrative by Robert Alter.
A professor of Hebrew and Comparative Literature at UC Berkeley, Alter sees the
OT with the eyes of a literary critic, subjecting the biblical texts to the
kind of critical analysis one might apply to the works of Shakespeare. The
texts display literary artistry and are not simply cobbled together from various
sources.
In chapter 3 of the book, Alter speaks of something
I’ve written about in previous
articles, how the same story gets told two or three times, sometimes with
the same characters:
Three times a patriarch is driven by famine to a southern region where he pretends that his wife is his sister, narrowly avoids a violation of the conjugal bond by the local ruler, and is sent away with gifts. Twice Hagar flees into the wilderness from Sarah’s hostility and discovers a miraculous well and that story itself seems only a special variation of the recurrent story of bitter rivalry between a barren, favored wife and a fertile co-wife or concubine. That situation, in turn, suggests another oft-told tale in the Bible, of a woman long barren who is vouchsafed a divine promise of progeny, whether by God himself or through a divine messenger or oracle, and who then gives birth to a hero. (p. 49)
Return with us now to those thrilling days of yesteryear
Alter provides a modern-day example that particularly stuck
with me over the years. Think of the gun-slinging hero in Westerns, able to
draw and outshoot the bad guys before they can even pull their triggers. In a similar analogy
I used way back when I began my blog five years ago, suppose that centuries
from now, only a dozen Western movies have been preserved. In all but one, the
hero has such a “hyperreflexive arm”. In the one exception, the hero has a
withered arm and has taught himself to shoot from a rifle slung over his back.
Alter imagines that, having studied the surviving samples of
20th-century Western cinema, future scholars might hypothesize these
are all derivations of one original story of a hero with lightning reflexes.
The oddball story of the rifleman with a withered arm would be a variant from a
different source tradition.
Unlike these imaginary scholars of Western cinema studies,
we who have seen untold number of Westerns from the Lone Ranger to Matt Dillon
know that the image of the quick-on-the-draw gunfighter is a convention in that
genre. When you have a major departure from the convention, the uniqueness
tells you something about the character or story. In this case, it might be the
hero’s determination to overcome a physical handicap or the rifle provides some
advantage over the typical six-shooter.
Alter calls these conventions “type-scenes” and identifies
several in the Bible: “the annunciation … of the birth of the hero to his
barren mother; the encounter with the future betrothed at a well; the epiphany
in the field; the initiatory trial; danger in the desert and the discovery of a
well or other form of sustenance; the testament of the dying hero” (p. 51).
Betrothal type-scenes
Alter spends the rest of the chapter discussing a particular
convention he calls the “betrothal type-scene” in which the hero of the story
meets his future bride at a well in a foreign land. He draws water for the “girl”
(how she is usually referenced) who then rushes home bringing news of the
stranger. The stranger is invited to a meal, after which the betrothal between
the stranger and the girl is finalized.
I’ll skip over the first betrothal type-scene in Genesis for now and
return to it later. In the second example (Gen
29:1-20), Jacob, escaping from his brother’s wrath, arrives at a well in a
foreign land. Rachel arrives to water her flock but a large stone covers the well’s
mouth. Jacob moves the massive stone and waters her flock. After Jacob informs
Rachel that he is her kinsman, she runs to tell her father, Laban. The closed
well is a metaphor for Rachel’s closed womb and Jacob’s labor in moving the
stone foreshadows the various obstacles he will need to overcome in securing his
bride and making his fortune. Stones also feature prominently in the Jacob
cycle of stories.
The third example comes from Exodus (2:15b-21)
where Moses, escaping from Pharaoh’s wrath in Egypt, arrives by a well in
Midian. Zipporah and her six sisters come to water their flock but are driven
off from the well by shepherds. Faced not just with an inanimate obstacle but
with enemies, Moses drives off the hostile shepherds and waters the flock of
Zipporah and her sisters. How Moses rises to the challenge is entirely appropriate
for someone who has killed an Egyptian taskmaster, will later face off with
Pharaoh to liberate his people, and become Israel’s military commander for the
next forty years. That the tale is briefly told is typical of how the Torah
doesn’t dwell on Moses’ personal life.
Rebekah takes charge
Now that we have reviewed a couple of examples, let’s return
to the first betrothal type-scene (Gen
24:10-61) and see how it differs from the simpler stories we just examined.
The main difference is that it is Abraham’s servant – instead of
Isaac – who travels to the foreign land. The servant showers Rebekah with gifts
that her brother is quick to notice. This is revealing of Laban’s grasping
nature and why he will later become one of Jacob’s obstacles.
Alter says this is the only example in the Bible of a
surrogate meeting the future bride. This is fitting because Isaac is a passive
and shadowy figure in Genesis. We last saw him about
to be sacrificed at God’s request. He’s not mentioned again until this betrothal
episode, and then he only appears at the end to take Rebekah as his wife. Isaac
appears in Gen 26 but these are recycled stories (wife-sister, treaty with
Abimelech, dispute over wells, and origin of the name of Beersheba) from the Abraham
cycle. Isaac plays a part in Gen 27 in which Jacob steals his blessing from
Esau, but by then Isaac is old and blind.
The other major departure is that Rebekah draws water for
the stranger (= the servant) instead of the other way around. The number of actions (11
verbs in the four verses of vv. 16-20) Rebekah takes (drawing water, filling her jar, pouring,
giving drink, etc.) are emblematic of the dominant role she later plays
(taking, cooking, dressing, giving) in the story of securing the blessing for
her favored son, Jacob (Gen 27). As the most-controlling of all the matriarchs,
it is appropriate that she dominates her betrothal scene.
Jesus the Bridegroom
Being a professor of Hebrew literature, Robert Alter limits
his analysis to the OT. But if we include the NT, we see something that looks
like a betrothal type-scene in the story of Jesus meeting the Samaritan woman
at the well in John
4:1-42. Once again we have a stranger (Jesus) in a foreign land (Samaria)
who is sitting beside Jacob’s well about noon when a Samaritan woman arrives
to draw water. A conversation ensues, after which the woman leaves her water
jar behind and returns to the city to inform its citizens of the stranger she
just met. Moved by her testimony, they invite Jesus to stay with them for a
couple of days.
A major difference in this version is that, instead of a
maiden, we have a five-times married woman. There is no actual exchange of
water, although the subject of water is the lynchpin of the dialogue that ensues
in which Jesus contrasts the stagnant water of the well with his living water (the
gift he has to offer). The episode ends not with a betrothal contract but with
the townsfolk coming to believe in Jesus.
Understanding the literary conventions puts the modern reader of the Bible in the mind of the originally intended audience. When we watch a Western and see the hero face off with the bad guy on a dusty street in front of a saloon, we expect a shootout. Similarly, when the ancient audience saw the hero arrive at a well in a foreign land, they expected he would meet his future wife there. Knowing how the scene is supposed to play out, the audience – modern or ancient – revels in any twists from the standard convention. As the saying goes, “God is in the details.”
No comments:
Post a Comment